<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: United 93</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onemanblogs.co.uk/index.php/archives/2007/01/23/united-93/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onemanblogs.co.uk/index.php/archives/2007/01/23/united-93</link>
	<description>I am me. Who are you?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:18:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.onemanblogs.co.uk/index.php/archives/2007/01/23/united-93/comment-page-1#comment-3711</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 09:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemanblogs.co.uk/index.php/archives/2007/01/23/united-93#comment-3711</guid>
		<description>Apologies Peter, not swallowed, moderated. You should be free to comment at will from here onwards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies Peter, not swallowed, moderated. You should be free to comment at will from here onwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.onemanblogs.co.uk/index.php/archives/2007/01/23/united-93/comment-page-1#comment-3700</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 00:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemanblogs.co.uk/index.php/archives/2007/01/23/united-93#comment-3700</guid>
		<description>Oh, and I&#039;ve written not one but two fairly thoughtful (ie non-silly) comments on the miniblog this evening, and both seem to be swallowed. Rather vexing. One on colour and one on text editors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and I&#8217;ve written not one but two fairly thoughtful (ie non-silly) comments on the miniblog this evening, and both seem to be swallowed. Rather vexing. One on colour and one on text editors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hannah</title>
		<link>http://www.onemanblogs.co.uk/index.php/archives/2007/01/23/united-93/comment-page-1#comment-3697</link>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 23:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemanblogs.co.uk/index.php/archives/2007/01/23/united-93#comment-3697</guid>
		<description>The thought of that film makes me really uncomfortable; I still can&#039;t bring myself to watch it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thought of that film makes me really uncomfortable; I still can&#8217;t bring myself to watch it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.onemanblogs.co.uk/index.php/archives/2007/01/23/united-93/comment-page-1#comment-3690</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemanblogs.co.uk/index.php/archives/2007/01/23/united-93#comment-3690</guid>
		<description>Did they mention that one of the leading fight-backers was gay?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did they mention that one of the leading fight-backers was gay?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CK</title>
		<link>http://www.onemanblogs.co.uk/index.php/archives/2007/01/23/united-93/comment-page-1#comment-3683</link>
		<dc:creator>CK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 09:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemanblogs.co.uk/index.php/archives/2007/01/23/united-93#comment-3683</guid>
		<description>I actually held off for a long time from watching this movie. I felt that it was unwise to go about creating a movie based around the events it depicts and that there stood a large chance it would either &#039;Hollywoodise&#039; the situation(s) that took place, or show them in a tasteless manner.

Fortunately, in watching a short time before Christmas, I was pleasantly surprised. It focused in equal measure on the inefficiencies in the security system and communication networks, as well as the sheer heroism and trials of the passengers and crew on UA93.

Thumbs up from me. Still unsure whether to see &#039;World Trade Centre&#039; as yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually held off for a long time from watching this movie. I felt that it was unwise to go about creating a movie based around the events it depicts and that there stood a large chance it would either &#8216;Hollywoodise&#8217; the situation(s) that took place, or show them in a tasteless manner.</p>
<p>Fortunately, in watching a short time before Christmas, I was pleasantly surprised. It focused in equal measure on the inefficiencies in the security system and communication networks, as well as the sheer heroism and trials of the passengers and crew on UA93.</p>
<p>Thumbs up from me. Still unsure whether to see &#8216;World Trade Centre&#8217; as yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

