<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not Watching the Watchmen?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onemanblogs.co.uk/index.php/archives/2009/03/09/not-watching-the-watchmen/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onemanblogs.co.uk/index.php/archives/2009/03/09/not-watching-the-watchmen</link>
	<description>I am me. Who are you?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:18:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.onemanblogs.co.uk/index.php/archives/2009/03/09/not-watching-the-watchmen/comment-page-1#comment-12685</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemanblogs.co.uk/?p=6290#comment-12685</guid>
		<description>And it is definitely a stunt cock, by the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And it is definitely a stunt cock, by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.onemanblogs.co.uk/index.php/archives/2009/03/09/not-watching-the-watchmen/comment-page-1#comment-12684</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemanblogs.co.uk/?p=6290#comment-12684</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a good film - and one that deserves to be seen on as big a screen as you can find.  Given the complete change of medium, it&#039;s astonishingly faithful to the source material, and definitely the most successful translation of Moore&#039;s work to cinema.

I hope it makes Dave Gibbons a wealthy man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a good film &#8211; and one that deserves to be seen on as big a screen as you can find.  Given the complete change of medium, it&#8217;s astonishingly faithful to the source material, and definitely the most successful translation of Moore&#8217;s work to cinema.</p>
<p>I hope it makes Dave Gibbons a wealthy man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.onemanblogs.co.uk/index.php/archives/2009/03/09/not-watching-the-watchmen/comment-page-1#comment-12669</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 15:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemanblogs.co.uk/?p=6290#comment-12669</guid>
		<description>Most of the fan reviews I&#039;ve read have been raving about how good it was. It seems that they took a lot of care in preserving the original feel and look from the graphic novel, and the changes they made apparently work really well.

I&#039;m quite excited to go this week. I wouldn&#039;t let a little bit of cock keep you away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the fan reviews I&#8217;ve read have been raving about how good it was. It seems that they took a lot of care in preserving the original feel and look from the graphic novel, and the changes they made apparently work really well.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m quite excited to go this week. I wouldn&#8217;t let a little bit of cock keep you away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pixeldiva</title>
		<link>http://www.onemanblogs.co.uk/index.php/archives/2009/03/09/not-watching-the-watchmen/comment-page-1#comment-12668</link>
		<dc:creator>pixeldiva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 14:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemanblogs.co.uk/?p=6290#comment-12668</guid>
		<description>I really enjoyed the film, but I have to admit that I was a little thrown out of the appropriate headspace every so often by variations on a theme of &quot;jesus, that&#039;s an enormous blue cock&quot; or &quot;I wonder if it&#039;s real&quot; or &quot;it&#039;s very still. I wonder if it&#039;s a stunt cock&quot;.

I&#039;m very glad we didn&#039;t go see it at the IMAX now. I may have been overcome by a fit of the vapours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoyed the film, but I have to admit that I was a little thrown out of the appropriate headspace every so often by variations on a theme of &#8220;jesus, that&#8217;s an enormous blue cock&#8221; or &#8220;I wonder if it&#8217;s real&#8221; or &#8220;it&#8217;s very still. I wonder if it&#8217;s a stunt cock&#8221;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m very glad we didn&#8217;t go see it at the IMAX now. I may have been overcome by a fit of the vapours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.onemanblogs.co.uk/index.php/archives/2009/03/09/not-watching-the-watchmen/comment-page-1#comment-12667</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 13:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemanblogs.co.uk/?p=6290#comment-12667</guid>
		<description>I walked out the cinema stating that it was &quot;bloody brilliant&quot;... and I&#039;ve read the book. I think it&#039;s definitely worth seeing on the big screen, don&#039;t cheat yourself because of the reviews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I walked out the cinema stating that it was &#8220;bloody brilliant&#8221;&#8230; and I&#8217;ve read the book. I think it&#8217;s definitely worth seeing on the big screen, don&#8217;t cheat yourself because of the reviews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

