<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tinkering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onemanblogs.co.uk/index.php/archives/2009/03/23/tinkering/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onemanblogs.co.uk/index.php/archives/2009/03/23/tinkering</link>
	<description>I am me. Who are you?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:18:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyle</title>
		<link>http://www.onemanblogs.co.uk/index.php/archives/2009/03/23/tinkering/comment-page-1#comment-12738</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemanblogs.co.uk/?p=6326#comment-12738</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a fan, I can&#039;t deny.

Prefer the dark red/brown (maroon?) color for the logo/brain, don&#039;t like the shouty Blogs (It also almost cries out for an ! at the end) and to me just doesn&#039;t convey what you&#039;re about. Whereas the &quot;old&quot; (current) one works for me.

I&#039;m sure there&#039;s other stuff you could do, and probably will - but no, personally I&#039;m not all that into the current idea for the rebrand.

Sorry, matey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a fan, I can&#8217;t deny.</p>
<p>Prefer the dark red/brown (maroon?) color for the logo/brain, don&#8217;t like the shouty Blogs (It also almost cries out for an ! at the end) and to me just doesn&#8217;t convey what you&#8217;re about. Whereas the &#8220;old&#8221; (current) one works for me.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure there&#8217;s other stuff you could do, and probably will &#8211; but no, personally I&#8217;m not all that into the current idea for the rebrand.</p>
<p>Sorry, matey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hg</title>
		<link>http://www.onemanblogs.co.uk/index.php/archives/2009/03/23/tinkering/comment-page-1#comment-12735</link>
		<dc:creator>Hg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemanblogs.co.uk/?p=6326#comment-12735</guid>
		<description>I tried to leave this comment last night, but my broadband had a major freakout just as I pressed Submit.

On similar lines to Graybo, I said that I thought the existing version is seriously good and that you tinker with it at your peril.  I made pretty much the same point about the word sizes.

Also, you can&#039;t really tell what the question marks are at this new size.  Honestly, I think the existing version is really good.  Find some other kind of outlet for your procrastination!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried to leave this comment last night, but my broadband had a major freakout just as I pressed Submit.</p>
<p>On similar lines to Graybo, I said that I thought the existing version is seriously good and that you tinker with it at your peril.  I made pretty much the same point about the word sizes.</p>
<p>Also, you can&#8217;t really tell what the question marks are at this new size.  Honestly, I think the existing version is really good.  Find some other kind of outlet for your procrastination!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.onemanblogs.co.uk/index.php/archives/2009/03/23/tinkering/comment-page-1#comment-12734</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemanblogs.co.uk/?p=6326#comment-12734</guid>
		<description>*rushes off to buy www.onemankicksarse.co.uk*
*and www.onemankicksass.co.uk*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*rushes off to buy <a href="http://www.onemankicksarse.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.onemankicksarse.co.uk</a>*<br />
*and <a href="http://www.onemankicksass.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.onemankicksass.co.uk</a>*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: graybo</title>
		<link>http://www.onemanblogs.co.uk/index.php/archives/2009/03/23/tinkering/comment-page-1#comment-12733</link>
		<dc:creator>graybo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemanblogs.co.uk/?p=6326#comment-12733</guid>
		<description>Hmm. I&#039;m not sure. I kind of like the fact that, in the current version, ONE MAN BLOGS - equal weight is given to each word (you&#039;re a man, there&#039;s one of you and you&#039;re blogging). In this proposed version, one man BLOGS, which is just a bit shouty and inflates the importance of blogging beyond what it deserves.

Of course, if you changed the title of the blog to one man KICKS ARSE, or something like that, then this format would be entirely appropriate.

My two euro cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. I&#8217;m not sure. I kind of like the fact that, in the current version, ONE MAN BLOGS &#8211; equal weight is given to each word (you&#8217;re a man, there&#8217;s one of you and you&#8217;re blogging). In this proposed version, one man BLOGS, which is just a bit shouty and inflates the importance of blogging beyond what it deserves.</p>
<p>Of course, if you changed the title of the blog to one man KICKS ARSE, or something like that, then this format would be entirely appropriate.</p>
<p>My two euro cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

